طراحی مدل استقرار و پیاده‌سازی کیفیت 4.0 با رویکرد تلفیقی مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی-دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی- دانشگاه اراک-ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد ایران

چکیده

هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر طراحی ساختاری است تا بتوان با استفاده از آن محرک‌های استقرار مناسب کیفیت 4.0 را در صنایع فولاد کشور بررسی نمود. به منظور انجام پژوهش حاضر در ابتدا ده محرک با استفاده از ادبیات پژوهش شناسایی گردید. سپس با استفاده از تکنیک مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری، به ساختاربندی این محرک‌ها با استفاده از نظرات 13 خبره اقدام شد. در ادامه به منظور برازش ساختار بدست آمده، از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری ابزارهای مرتبط با آن شامل برازش مدل اندازه‌گیری، ساختاری و برازش کلی مدل استفاده گردید. بدین منظور پرسشنامه‌ای حاوی 33 سؤال با طیف پنج‌گانه لیکرت طراحی گردید و به منظور تکمیل آن از 214 تن از مدیران و کارکنان صنایع فولاد کشور، نظرخواهی گردید. یافته‌های حاصل از ساختار برازش شده در پژوهش نشان از ارائه ساختاری 8 سطحی دارد که در آن محرک رهبری به عنوان محرک آغازین شناسایی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing the establishment and implementation model of quality 4.0 with the integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling and structural equation modeling

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamidreza Talaie 1
  • Mehran Ziaeian 2
  • Pooria Malekinejad 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Arak University, Iran
2 PhD student in Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, , Yazd. Iran
3 PhD student in Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, , Yazd. Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of the current research is to design a structure so that it can be used to investigate the drivers of the appropriate implementation of quality 4.0 in the country's steel industry. In order to carry out this research, ten stimuli were initially identified using research literature. Then, using the interpretative structural modeling technique, these stimuli were structured using the opinions of 13 experts. , in order to fit the obtained structure, the structural equation modeling of the tools related to it, including measurement model fitting, structural and general model fitting, were used. For this purpose, a questionnaire containing 33 questions with a five-point Likert scale was designed and in order to complete it, opinions were sought from 214 managers and employees of the country's steel industry. The findings of the research on the high effectiveness of reward stimuli and control of big data in proper implementation have quality 4.0.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Quality Management
  • Quality 4.0
  • Fourth Industrial Revolution
  • Industry 4.0

مراجع

  • Augustyn, M. M., Elshaer, I. A., & Akamavi, R. K. (2021). Competing models of quality management and financial performance improvement. The Service Industries Journal, 41(11-12), 803-831.
  • Yamada, T. T., Poltronieri, C. F., do Nascimento Gambi, L., & Gerolamo, M. C. (2013). Why does the implementation of quality management practices fail? A qualitative study of barriers in Brazilian companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 366-370.
  • Klochkov, Y. S., & Tveryakov, A. M. (2020). Approaches to the improvement of quality management methods. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(2), 163-172.
  • Serna-Saldivar, S. O., & Jacobo-Velázquez, D. A. (2022). Quality Control and Assurance in the Snack Food Industry. In Snack Foods (pp. 477-518): CRC Press.
  • Pambreni, Y., Khatibi, A., Azam, S., & Tham, J. (2019). The influence of total quality management toward organization performance. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1397-1406.
  • Marzagão, D. S. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Critical success factors for Six Sigma projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1505-1518.
  • Aleksandrova, S. V., Vasiliev, V. A., & Alexandrov, M. N. (2019). Integration of quality management and digital technologies. Paper presented at the 2019 International Conference" Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies"(IT&QM&IS).
  • Carvalho, A. V., Enrique, D. V., Chouchene, A., & Charrua-Santos, F. (2021). Quality 4.0: an overview. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 341-346.
  • Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Rajak, S. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107546.
  • Shivam, & Gupta, M. (2022). Quality process reengineering in industry 4.0: A BPR perspective. Quality Engineering, 1-20.
  • Yu, Z., Khan, S. A. R., & Umar, M. (2022). Circular economy practices and industry 4.0 technologies: A strategic move of automobile industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 796-809.
  • Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2019). Key ingredients for evaluating Industry 4.0 readiness for organizations: a literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal.
  • Aini, Q., Riza, B. S., Santoso, N. P. L., Faturahman, A., & Rahardja, U. (2020). Digitalization of Smart Student Assessment Quality in Era 4.0. J, 9(1.2).
  • Gadre, M., & Deoskar, A. (2020). Industry 4.0–digital transformation, challenges and benefits. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 139-149.
  • Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International, 2, 100109.
  • Hassoun, A., Jagtap, S., Garcia-Garcia, G., Trollman, H., Pateiro, M., Lorenzo, J. M., . . . Šimat, V. (2022). Food quality 4.0: From traditional approaches to digitalized automated analysis. Journal of Food Engineering, 111216.
  • Arm, J., Benesl, T., Marcon, P., Bradac, Z., Schröder, T., Belyaev, A., . . . Zezulka, F. (2021). Automated design and integration of asset administration shells in components of industry 4.0. Sensors, 21(6), 2004.
  • Shayganmehr, M., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). Industry 4.0 enablers for a cleaner production and circular economy within the context of business ethics: A study in a developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125280.
  • Wankmüller, C., & Reiner, G. (2020). Coordination, cooperation and collaboration in relief supply chain management. Journal of Business Economics, 90(2), 239-276.
  • Mirghfouri, S H, Morvati Sharifabadi A, Asadian Ardakani F. Designing a Model for Risk Assessment in Supply Chain with Artificial Neural Network Approach (Case Study: Iran-Yazd Alloy Steel Company. Industrial Management Studies, 2014; 11 (30): 1-21. (In Persian).
  • Safari Darbarzi, A, Sadra Abargoui, N, Dashti, H., & Sarchemi, D. (2021). Designing the establishment structure of comprehensive quality management in National Bank branches of Yazd province. Standard and quality management. No 1, 110-152. (In Persian).
  • Shaker Ardakani, M, Abzari, M, Shaimi, A., & Fathi, S. (2015). Diversity management and productivity of human resources: mediating effects of perceived organizational attractiveness, perceived organizational justice and perceived social identity in Isfahan steel industry. Iranian Journal of Management Studies. No 407-432. (In Persian).
  • Morovati Sharif Abadi, A., Andalib Ardakani, D., Mirenjad, S. A., & Johari Naimi, F. (2018). Designing the two-column improvement model of the supply chain with the structural equation modeling approach (Study case: Steel industry of Yazd province). Productivity Management, No. 48. 7-35. (In Persian).
  • , & Mirabi. A. (2018). Presentation and validation of strategic marketing model in large companies of steel industry, Novin Marketing Research Quarterly. No 2. 77-108. (In Persian).
  • Nenadál, J., Vykydal, D., Halfarová, P., & Tylečková, E. (2022). Quality 4.0 Maturity Assessment in Light of the Current Situation in the Czech Republic. Sustainbility, 14(12), 7519.
  • Santos, G., Sá, J. C., Félix, M. J., Barreto, L., Carvalho, F., Doiro, M., . . . Stefanović, M. (2021). New needed quality management skills for quality managers 4.0. Sustainbility, 13(11), 6149.
  • Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daroczi, M. (2022). A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. TOTAL Qyality Management & Business excellence, 33(9-10), 1164-1182.
  • Corti, D., Masiero, S., & Gladysz, B. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Quality Management: identification of main challenges towards a Quality 4.0 approach. Paper presented at the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).
  • Zonnenshain, A., & Kenett, R. S. (2020). Quality 4.0—the challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering, 32(4), 614-626.
  • Küpper, D., Knizek, C., Ryeson, D., & Noecker, J. (2019). Quality 4.0 takes more than technology. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), 1-14.
  • Maganga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. (2022). Quality 4.0 transition framework for Tanzanian manufacturing industries. The TQM Journal(ahead-of-print).
  • Sureshchandar, G. (2022). Quality 4.0–understanding the criticality of the dimensions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. International journal of Qyality & Reliability Management.
  • Sony, M., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., & McDermott, O. (2021). Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: an exploratory study. The TQM Journal.
  • Antony, J., Sony, M., Furterer, S., McDermott, O., & Pepper, M. (2021). Quality 4.0 and its impact on organizational performance: an integrative viewpoint. The TQM Journal.
  • Fonseca, L., Amaral, A., & Oliveira, J. (2021). Quality 4.0: the EFQM 2020 model and industry 4.0 relationships and implications. Sustainbility, 13(6), 3107.
  • Chiarini, A., & Kumar, M. (2021). What is Quality 4.0? An exploratory sequential mixed methods study of Italian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 1-21.
  • Dias, A. M., Carvalho, A. M., & Sampaio, P. (2021). Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. . International journal of Qyality & Reliability Management.
  • ] Yurin, D., Deniskina, A., Boytsov, B., & Karpovich, M. (2021). Quality 4.0. Time of revolutionary changes in the QMS. Paper presented at the E3S web of conferences.
  • [39] Escobar, C. A., McGovern, M. E., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2021). Quality 4.0: a review of big data challenges in manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32(8), 2319-2334.
  • Van der Poll, J. A. (2022). Towards a Problematization Framework of 4IR Formalisms: The Case of Quality 4.0. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Vision and Computing.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Ghadge, A., & Raut, R. (2020). A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs-A review and empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107853.
  • Alzahrani, B., Bahaitham, H., Andejany, M., & Elshennawy, A. (2021). How ready is higher education for quality 4.0 transformation according to the LNS research framework? SUSTAINABILITY, 13(9), 5169.
  • Emblemsvåg, J. (2020). On Quality 4.0 in project-based industries. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 725-739.
  • Cao, Z., Zhou, P., Li, R., Huang, S., & Wu, D. (2020). Multiagent deep reinforcement learning for joint multichannel access and task offloading of mobile-edge computing in industry 4.0. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7), 6201-6213.
  • Shoar, S., & Chileshe, N. (2021). Exploring the causes of design changes in building construction projects: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Sustainbility, 13(17), 9578.
  • Wankhede, V. A., & Vinodh, S. (2021). Application of total interpretive structural modeling for analyzing factors of additive manufacturing and industry 4.0 integration. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 27(8), 1591-1608.
  • Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques: Routledge.
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. In: Springer Nature.
  • Kineber, A. F., Othman, I., Oke, A. E., Chileshe, N., & Buniya, M. K. (2021). Impact of value management on building projects success: structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021011.
  • Lin, X., & Powell, S. R. (2021). Examining the relation between whole numbers and fractions: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, 102017.
  • Mai, R., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2021). A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121142.
  • Naidoo, S., Hewitt, M., & Bussin, M. (2019). A leadership model validation: Dimensions influential to innovation. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 50(1), 1-11.
  • Kohnová, L., Papula, J., & Salajová, N. (2019). Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Verslas: Teorija ir praktika/Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 137-145.
  • ] Persaud, A. (2020). Key competencies for big data analytics professions: a multimethod study. Information Technology & People.

 

نشریه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی و مدیریت کیفیت
دوره 12، شماره 1
خرداد 1401
صفحه 51-68

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار