A data-driven decision-making model for supplier selection in the LARG supply chain management with emphasis on the cultural dimension

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Management, Firouzkouh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firouzkouh, Iran.

2 Department of Industries, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Mazandaran University of Science and Technology, Babol, Iran .

Abstract
Purpose: In today's competitive environment, selecting suitable suppliers plays a pivotal role in enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of supply chains. The LARG supply chain model, as a comprehensive approach, integrates various dimensions in supplier management. However, despite its critical influence on interaction success and supplier selection, the cultural dimension has received limited attention. This study aims to evaluate suppliers within the LARG framework while incorporating the cultural dimension to improve supply chain performance and achieve sustainable competitive advantage.
Methodology: This research developed a data-driven and forward-looking decision-making model for supplier evaluation and selection. First, key criteria were identified through literature review and expert consultation, and weighted using the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method (FBWM). Then, suppliers' efficiency was assessed and ranked using Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (FDEA). Subsequently, the Random Forest algorithm was employed to predict future supplier performance, yielding highly accurate results.
Findings: The initial results highlighted the significance of sub-criteria such as greenhouse gas emission reduction, risk management, quality, and delivery speed in supplier evaluation. In the second phase, supplier efficiency was analyzed under various α-cuts and classified into three performance groups: high, medium, and low. The Random Forest model demonstrated high accuracy in forecasting supplier performance. Moreover, the paired t-test results revealed that incorporating the cultural dimension significantly improves the supplier selection process.
Originality/Value: The proposed model contributes to strategic decision-making by identifying key performance factors, enabling predictive evaluation, and employing robust analytical tools. This approach not only reduces risks and costs but also serves as a practical model for improving supply chain performance in similar industries.

Keywords


[1]     Zeidi, H., Fathi, M. R., & Pishadar, M. (2025). The causal model of circular supply chain in the petrochemical industry of Iran with the FDelphi-FDEMATEL approach. Innovation management and operational strategies, e218707. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/imos.2025.508401.1447
[2]     Riaz, M., & Farid, H. M. A. (2023). Enhancing green supply chain efficiency through linear diophantine fuzzy soft-max aggregation operators. Journal of industrial intelligence, 1(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.56578/jii010102
[3]     Esmaeilian, G., Fardoie, R. S., Hourali, M., & Farbod, E. (2024). Investigating the impact of blockchain technology adoption on integration and economic sustainability of the automotive supply chain: A bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Transactions on quantitative finance and beyond, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v1i1.16
[4]     Zoghi, A., Lotfi, F. H., Saen, R. F., & Saati, S. (2024). A cutting-edge data envelopment analysis model for measuring sustainable supplier performance like never before. Journal of cleaner production, 462, 142714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142714
[5]     Islam, S., Amin, S. H., & Wardley, L. J. (2024). A supplier selection & order allocation planning framework by integrating deep learning, principal component analysis, and optimization techniques. Expert systems with applications, 235, 121121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121121
[6]     Hesami, F. (2024). A hybrid ANP-TOPSIS method for strategic supplier selection in RL under rough uncertainty: A case study in the electronics industry. Uncertainty discourse and applications, 1(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.v1i1.25
[7]     Sahu, A. K., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Sahu, A. K., Sahu, N. K., Antony, J., & Tortorella, G. L. (2023). Decision-making framework for supplier selection using an integrated MCDM approach in a lean-agile-resilient-green environment: Evidence from Indian automotive sector. TQM journal, 35(4), 964–1006. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2021-0372
[8]     Elbaz, J., & Iddik, S. (2020). Culture and green supply chain management (GSCM): A systematic literature review and a proposal of a model. Management of environmental quality: An international journal, 31(2), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2019-0197
[9]     Cao, Z., Huo, B., Li, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: A contingency and configuration approach. Supply chain management: An international journal, 20(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2013-0426
[10]   Kumar, S., Liu, J., & Demirag, O. C. (2016). National culture’s impact on effectiveness of supply chain disruption management. Journal of applied business and economics, 17(4), 11–29. https://scholar.valpo.edu/cba_fac_pub/34/
[11]   Braunscheidel, M. J., Suresh, N. C., & Boisnier, A. D. (2010). Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human resource management, 49(5), 883–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20381
[12]   Gao, X., & Cao, C. (2020). A novel multi-objective scenario-based optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics supply chain network redesign considering facility reconstruction. Journal of cleaner production, 270, 122405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122405
[13]   Koc, K., Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., & Işık, Z. (2023). Developing a probabilistic decision-making model for reinforced sustainable supplier selection. International journal of production economics, 259, 108820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108820
[14]   Garcia-Buendia, N., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Maqueira-Marín, J. M., Romano, P., & Molinaro, M. (2025). Strategic supplier performance in a competitive landscape: Enhancing organizational performance through lean supply chain management. BRQ business research quarterly, 28(2), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444231210566%0A
[15]   ForouzeshNejad, A. A. (2023). Leagile and sustainable supplier selection problem in the Industry 4.0 era: A case study of the medical devices using hybrid multi-criteria decision making tool. Environmental science and pollution research, 30(5), 13418–13437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22916-x
[16]   Haffar, S., & Ozceylan, E. (2024). Blockchain-based system for supplier selection in sustainable and leagile supply chains. IEEE access, 12, 139883–139911. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3467059
[17]   Ulutaş, A., Krstić, M., Topal, A., Agnusdei, L., Tadić, S., & Miglietta, P. P. (2024). A novel hybrid Gray MCDM model for resilient supplier selection problem. Mathematics, 12(10), 1444. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101444
[18]   Sun, J., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Zhu, F., & Wang, N. (2024). A probabilistic uncertain linguistic decision-making model for resilient supplier selection based on extended TOPSIS and BWM. International journal of fuzzy systems, 26(3), 992–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01649-0
[19]   Becerra, P., & Diaz, J. (2025). Supplier selection model considering sustainable and resilience aspects for mining industry. Systems, 13(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13020081
[20]   Anvarjonov, N. B. U., Um, K. H., Zhong, D. Y., & Shine, E. K. (2024). Achieving sustainability in manufacturing: The nexus of green supplier selection, green performance and outcome and process controls. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 35(3), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2023-0398
[21]   Ograh, T., Ayarkwa, J., Acheampong, A., & Abu, I. M. (2025). Advancing collaboration toward green supplier selection: Perspective of green relational capital. Journal of public procurement, 25(1), 64–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-04-2024-0046
[22]   Wu, H. H., & Chang, S. Y. (2015). A case study of using DEMATEL method to identify critical factors in green supply chain management. Applied mathematics and computation, 256, 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.041
[23]   Mohamadi Zanjiran, D., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Prentkovskis, O. (2019). LARG supplier selection based on integrating house of quality, Taguchi loss function and MOPA. Economic research-ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 1944–1964. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1635036
[24]   Ghazvinian, A., Feng, B., Feng, J., Talebzadeh, H., & Dzikuć, M. (2024). Lean, agile, resilient, green, and sustainable (LARGS) supplier selection using multi-criteria structural equation modeling under fuzzy environments. Sustainability 2024, vol. 16, page 1594, 16(4), 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041594
[25]   Kabadayi, N., & Bakkal, S. (2024). Fermatean fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection on larg supply chain paradigm. International conference on intelligent and fuzzy systems (pp. 373–382). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67192-0_43
[26]   Sheykhizadeh, M., Ghasemi, R., Vandchali, H. R., Sepehri, A., & Torabi, S. A. (2024). A hybrid decision-making framework for a supplier selection problem based on lean, agile, resilience, and green criteria: A case study of a pharmaceutical industry. Environment, development and sustainability, 26(12), 30997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04135-7
[27]   Zeynali, F. R., Hatami, S., Khameneh, R. T., & Ghanavati-Nejad, M. (2024). Evaluating the performance of the raw material providers based on the customer-based LARG (CLARG) paradigm: A machine learning-based method. Journal of optimization in industrial engineering, 2(17). https://shura.shu.ac.uk/34529/
[28]   Nayeri, S., Khoei, M. A., Rouhani-Tazangi, M. R., GhanavatiNejad, M., Rahmani, M., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2023). A data-driven model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection and order allocation problem in a responsive supply chain: A case study of healthcare system. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 124, 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106511
[29]   Lin, S. W., & Lu, W. M. (2024). Using inverse DEA and machine learning algorithms to evaluate and predict suppliers’ performance in the apple supply chain. International journal of production economics, 271, 109203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109203
[30]   Saeidifar, S. M., Mahdavi, I., Tajdin, A., & Javadian, N. (2025). Proposing a data-driven decision-making model for evaluating sustainable and resilient suppliers in the automotive industry. Journal of quality engineering and management, 15(1), 83-109. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.48313/jqem.2025.529590.1555
[31]   Akbar, D., & Şimşek, M. (2025). Optimizing supplier selection with large language models: An AI-driven approach for resilient supply chains. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4767072/v2
[32]   Xie, Z., Tian, G., & Tao, Y. (2022). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection in the circular economy and industry 4.0 era. Sustainability 2022, vol. 14, page 16809, 14(24), 16809. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142416809
[33]   Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Ahmadi, A., & Al-e-Hashem, S. M. J. M. (2020). Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for an integrated water supply and wastewater collection system under uncertainty. Journal of environmental management, 275, 111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111277
[34]   Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
[35]   Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A. E., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). An integrated decision-making model for supplier evaluation in public healthcare system: The case study of a Spanish hospital. Journal of enterprise information management, 33(5), 965–989. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2019-0294
[36]   Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution and logistics management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
[37]   Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Sabouhi, F. (2018). Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks. International journal of production research, 56(17), 5945–5968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1461950
[38]   Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., & Benabdellah, A. C. (2021). Suppliers selection ontology for viable digital supply chain performance. IFIP advances in information and communication technology, 633 IFIP, 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85910-7_66
[39]   Chaouni Benabdellah, A., Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, A., & El Baz, J. (2023). Blockchain technology for viable circular digital supplychains: An integrated approach for evaluating the implementation barriers. Benchmarking, 30(10), 4397–4424. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0240
[40]   Sawik, T. (2013). Selection and protection of suppliers in a supply chain with disruption risks. International journal of logistics systems and management, 15(2–3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2013.053763
[41]   Garcia-Herreros, P., Wassick, J. M., & Grossmann, I. E. (2014). Design of resilient supply chains with risk of facility disruptions. Industrial and engineering chemistry research, 53(44), 17240–17251. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5004174
[42]   Sawik, T. (2013). Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 41(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.05.003
[43]   Torabi, S. A., Soufi, H. R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2014). A new framework for business impact analysis in business continuity management (with a case study). Safety science, 68, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.017
[44]   Torabi, S. A., Baghersad, M., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 79, 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.03.005
[45]   Cardoso, S. R., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P., Relvas, S., & Novais, A. Q. (2015). Resilience metrics in the assessment of complex supply-chains performance operating under demand uncertainty. Omega, 56, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.03.008
[46]   Zahiri, B., Zhuang, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 103, 109–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.009
[47]   Hasani, A., Mokhtari, H., & Fattahi, M. (2021). A multi-objective optimization approach for green and resilient supply chain network design: A real-life case study. Journal of cleaner production, 278, 123199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123199
[48]   Lotfi, R., Hazrati, R., Aghakhani, S., Afshar, M., Amra, M., & Ali, S. S. (2024). A data-driven robust optimization in viable supply chain network design by considering Open Innovation and Blockchain Technology. Journal of cleaner production, 436, 140369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140369
[49]   Salleh, N. H. M., Abd Rasidi, N. A. S., & Jeevan, J. (2020). Lean, agile, resilience and green (LARG) paradigm in supply chain operations: a trial in a seaport system. Australian journal of maritime and ocean affairs, 12(4), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2020.1833273
[50]   Sonar, H., Gunasekaran, A., Agrawal, S., & Roy, M. (2022). Role of lean, agile, resilient, green, and sustainable paradigm in supplier selection. Cleaner Logistics and supply chain4, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100059
[51]   Li, Y., Diabat, A., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: A DEMATEL approach. Annals of operations research, 287(1), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03453-2
[52]   Sonar, H., Gunasekaran, A., Agrawal, S., & Roy, M. (2022). Role of lean, agile, resilient, green, and sustainable paradigm in supplier selection. Cleaner logistics and supply chain, 4, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100059
[53]   Khanzadi, F., Radfar, R., & Pilevari, N. (2024). A review of lean, agile, resilient, and green (LARG) supply chain management in engineering, business and management areas. Decision science letters, 13(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2024.3.002
[54]   Osgooei, E. and Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S. (2025). An extended mathematical model for solving z-number linear programing problems using additive weighting method based on best-worst method. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications, e214287. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2025.451599.1442
[55]   Koç, S., Erden, C., Ateş, Ç., & Ceviz, E. (2024). Evaluation of potential logistics village alternatives using bayesian best-worst method. Optimality, 1(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.22105/opt.v1i1.35
[56]   Bayatzadeh, S., & Talaie, H. (2024). Identifying and evaluating of sustainable and resilient supplier selection criteria according to industry 5.0 concepts (Case study: Steel industry). Tasmimgiri va tahqiq dar amaliyyat, 9(4), 1045-1063. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2025.498734.1904
[57]   Fallahpour, A., Nayeri, S., Sheikhalishahi, M., Wong, K. Y., Tian, G., & Fathollahi-Fard, A. M. (2021). A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: A case study of Malaysian Palm oil industry. Environmental science and pollution research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12491-y
[58]   Yekta, A. P., Noveiri, M. J. S., Maghbouli, M., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2024). Dynamic DEA with common weights: A case study of Iranian Airlines. Journal of uncertain systems, 17(2), 2440001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1752890924400014
[59]   Lagzi, M. D., sajadi, S. M., & Taghizadeh-Yazdi, M. (2024). A hybrid stochastic data envelopment analysis and decision tree for performance prediction in retail industry. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 80, 103908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103908
[60]   Soltani, M. R., Edalatpanah, S. A., Sobhani, F. M., & Najafi, S. E. (2020). A novel two-stage DEA model in fuzzy environment: Application to industrial workshops performance measurement. International journal of computational intelligence systems, 13(1), 1134–1152. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200731.002
[61]   Yazdani, M., & Kazemipor, H. (2024). Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization by combining the BSC and DEA evaluation systems. Financial and banking strategic studies, 1(4), 272-280. (In Persian). https://www.journal-fbs.com/article_196209.html?lang=en
[62]   Ucal Sari, I., & Ak, U. (2022). Machine efficiency measurement in industry 4.0 using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications, 3(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2022.326644.1199
[63]   Taghizade Tame, L., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Rostamy Malkhalifeh, M. (In Press). Fuzzy evaluation of fixed cost allocation in two-stage networks with undesirable outputs: Considering ideal and anti-ideal points. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2025.490267.1710
[64]   Zuluaga, R., Camelo-Guarín, A., & Hoz, E. D. La. (2023). Assessing the relative impact of colombian higher education institutions using fuzzy data envelopment analysis (Fuzzy-Dea) in state evaluations. Journal on efficiency and responsibility in education and science, 16(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160404
[65]   Shikhzahedi, M. T. Y., Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Edalatpanah, S. A. (2024). Inverse data envelopment analysis model to improve efficiency by increasing outputs. Decision making: applications in management and engineering, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame722024788
[66]   Omrani, H., Emrouznejad, A., Teplova, T., & Amini, M. (2024). Efficiency evaluation of electricity distribution companies: Integrating data envelopment analysis and machine learning for a holistic analysis. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 133, 108636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108636
[67]   An, Q., Huang, S., Han, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Ensemble learning method for classification: Integrating data envelopment analysis with machine learning. Computers and operations research, 169, 106739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2024.106739
[68]   Paul, U. K. (2024). Estimation of technical efficiency of chemical-free farming using data envelopment analysis and machine learning: evidence from India. Benchmarking, 31(1), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0494
[69]   Kang, P. S., & Bhawna, B. (2025). Enhancing supply chain resilience through supervised machine learning: supplier performance analysis and risk profiling for a multi-class classification problem. Business process management journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2024-0174
[70]   Chen, C. B., & Klein, C. M. (1997). A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part b (cybernetics), 27(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.552183