Designing a causal model to improve the quality of supervision of banks and credit institutions based on the type of mission

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Financial Management, Banking Major, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Business Administration, Business Policy Direction, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Purpose: The existing supervisory system in many countries, especially in Iran, mainly uses general and integrated models in which the structural, mission, and operational differences between banks and financial institutions have not been properly taken into account. This uniform approach has led to reduced risk identification accuracy, a lack of adaptation to each financial institution's specific needs, and reduced effectiveness of supervisory measures. The main objective of the present study is to design a cause-and-effect model to improve the quality of supervision based on the mission type of banks and financial institutions, using a mixed approach (Meta-Synthesis-Fuzzy DEMATEL).
Methodology: The present research was conducted using a mixed method (Qualitative-quantitative) and exploratory approach. Then, using a survey, 25 banking industry experts with at least 10 years of executive experience in finance and banking and master's and doctoral degrees were recruited to examine the validity and reliability of the proposed model. Also, paired-comparison questionnaires were distributed to the experts, and the intensity of impact and effectiveness between the research dimensions were examined using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making technique, DEMATEL.
Findings: The research findings show that using the meta-synthesis approach, 9 dimensions and 40 components were selected. They were selected from the dimensions. Also, the results of fuzzy DEMATL analysis show that the most influential dimension of the present study regarding the supervision of banks and credit institutions based on the value of (D+R) is the legal and regulatory supervision dimension among the independent dimensions and the cause with the highest value and the most influential variable. Also, among the dependent and affected dimensions based on the lowest value (D-R), the environmental and social performance dimension was recognized as the most influential variable in improving the quality of supervision of banks and credit institutions.
Originality/Value: Using a meta-combination approach in the analysis of previous research, which can provide new horizons for designing effective models based on improving the quality of banking system supervision. Therefore, the present study is of high scientific and practical importance for advancing methodology, responding to the current needs of the country's financial system, and improving the effectiveness of supervision of monetary institutions. This research has also led to recognition of the intensity of the relationships among the dimensions of quality improvement in banking industry supervision and has drawn more attention to these components.

Keywords


[1]     Tumewang, Y. K., Almarayeh, T., & Alharasis, E. (2025). Sustainability committee, external assurance, and esg performance: Empirical evidence from banking industry in emerging economies. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 32(2), 2728–2745. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3095
[2]     Farooq, M., Al-Jabri, Q., Khan, M. T., Humayon, A. A., & Ullah, S. (2025). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance in the Islamic and conventional banking industries: A Malaysian evidence. Journal of Islamic accounting and business research, 16(2), 411–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2023-0030
[3]     Kadkhodaee, A., & Moghaddami, M. (2025). Monitoring the performance of international economic organizations; a‎ case study of the International Bank for Reconstruction and‎ Development. Public law studies quarterly, 1-20. (In Persian). https://doi.com/10.22059/JPLSQ.2023.349606.3197
[4]     Seyed Nourani, S. M. R., Amiri, H., & Rafeei, M. (2011). A comparative supervision overbanking system in Iran, and selected countries. Journal of evaluation knowledge, 3(2), 5-34. (In Persian). https://www.salamatedari-mag.ir/article_252319.html?lang=en
[5]     Ivanaki, S. M. M., Shams, M. F., & Hanifi, F. (2023). Presenting the risk-based supervision model on banks and credit institution by using grounded theory. Quarterly journal of fiscal and economic policies, 11(41), 197-242. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/qjfep.11.41.197
[6]     Adewale, A. A., & Mamun, S. (2020). Risk-based supervisory in Islamic banking. Islamic financial services board (IFSB), (In Persian). https://iaif.ir/index.php/fa/archive/item/3855-2021-01-09-07-47-15
[7]     Argimón, I., & Rodríguez-Moreno, M. (2022). Risk and control in complex banking groups. Journal of banking & finance, 134, 106038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.106038
[8]     Mazhari, M., & Alavi,  hamid rajabi. (2024). Approaches for monitoring banks and credit institutions. Journal of new achievements in public law, 11(1), 36-55. (In Persian). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30495/DPI.1403.1119627
[9]     Baral, K. J. (2005). Health check-up of commercial banks in the framework of CAMEL: A case study of joint venture banks in Nepal. Journal of nepalese business studies, 2(1), 41–55.
[10]   Bouteska, A., Büyükoğlu, B., & Ekşi, I. H. (2023). How effective are banking regulations on banking performance and risk? Evidence from selected European countries. Finance research letters, 53, 103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103604
[11]   Razavi Araghi, S. M. R., & Jahanshad, A. (2023). Provide a model of factors that affect external audits of banks on the basis of effective banking supervision approach. Journal of accounting and social interests, 13(1), 13-16. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/jaasci.2023.41991.1734
[12]   Hai, S., Minhaj, S., & Ahmed, R. (2007). Implementation of Basel II: Issues, challenges and implications for developing countries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241714783
[13]   He, R., Li, X., Chen, G., Chen, G., & Liu, Y. (2020). Generative adversarial network-based semi-supervised learning for real-time risk warning of process industries. Expert systems with applications, 150, 113244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113244
[14]   IOSCO. (2009). Guidelines to emerging market regulators regarding requirements for minimum entry and continuous risk-based supervision of market intermediaries. https://b2n.ir/yq1269
[15]   Kaviani, H., Vijeh, M., & Rostami, V. (2023). The legal pathology of credit institutions in Iran’s monetary and banking system. Public law studies quarterly, 53(2), 737-768. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2020.290649.2191
[16]   Najafi, R., Zaj, M. M., Fallahshams, M., & Saeedi, A. (2020). A comparative study of the structure and supervisory model of financial institutions in Iran’s capital market and selected countries. Investment Knowledge, 36(1), 451-488. (In Persian). https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/842738?FullText=FullText
[17]   Asadi, M., Mohammadi, A., & Allahbakhshi, A. A. (2020). Rating of Iran banking sector based on CAMELS model. Journal of financial analysis, 3(1), 47-70. (In Persian). https://www.magiran.com/p2176598
[18]   Farman Ara, V., & Ghaffari, F. (2019). Developing a model and indicators for evaluating and supervising Iran’s banking system (Based on upstream documents, models, and international experiences). Defense economics and sustainable development, 4(12), 129-149. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1330043
[19]   Khashei, V., Akbari, M., & Qasemi Shams, M. (2019). Strategic control in Iranian banking: A historical look at past patterns and presentation of a new model. Journal of improvement management, 13(3), 23-50. (In Persian). https://www.behboodmodiriat.ir/article_101786.html?lang=en
[20]   Zolfaghari, A., Afsari, A., Shahbazi Ghiasi, M., Soleimani, M., Aziznejad, S., Hosseini Dolat Abadi, S. M., Amin Azad, A. A., & Nadri, K. (2018). A study of banking supervision systems in selected countries with emphasis on banking laws. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1333092
[21]   Rohani, S. A., & Parhizkari, S. A. (2017). The necessity, scope and state of independence of the banking supervisory suthority in Iran. Quarterly journal of economic research and policies, 25(81), 33-84. (In Persian). http://qjerp.ir/article-1-1581-fa.html
[22]   Panda, M., Garnayak, M., Ray, M., Rath, S., Mohanta, A., & Priyadarshini, S. B. B. (2025). Hadoop in banking: Event-driven performance evaluation. The scientific world journal, 2025(1), 4375194. https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/4375194
[23]   Remo-Diez, N., Mendaña-Cuervo, C., & Arenas-Parra, M. (2025). Board capital and CEO power configurations to promote ESG performance: The case of the european banking industry. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 32(2), 2815–2834. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3106
[24]   Abiad, Z., Abraham, R., El-Chaarani, H., & Binsaddig, R. O. (2025). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on the financial performance of the banking sector in gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries: The moderating role of bank size. Journal of risk and financial management, 18(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010040
[25]   Agnese, P., Arduino, F. R., Cerciello, M., & Taddeo, S. (2024). Does board knowledge matter for ESG performance in the European banking industry? Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 31(5), 4454–4468. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2811
[26]   Rao, P. K., & Shukla, A. (2024). Strategic sustainability in Indian banking industry: A performance analysis. International journal of productivity and performance management, 73(6), 2016–2034. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2023-0199
[27]   shahbazi,  mousa, & Shoghi, M. (2023). Designing a process model to monitor and monitor future developments in the banking industry. Budget and finance strategic research, 4(1), 87-110. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.27171809.1402.4.1.4.4
[28]   Lu, J., & Boateng, A. (2018). Board composition, monitoring and credit risk: Evidence from the UK banking industry. Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 51(4), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0698-x
[29]   Sáez-Fernández, F. J., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Jiménez-Hernández, I. (2021). Performance and risk in the Brazilian banking industry. Heliyon, 7(3), e06524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06524
[30]   Jamal Zeidan, M. (2012). The effects of violating banking regulations on the financial performance of the US banking industry. Journal of financial regulation and compliance, 20(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581981211199425
[31]   Alhawamdeh, M., & Lee, A. (2025). A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the barriers of offsite construction projects. International journal of construction management, 25(9), 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2397287
[32]   Khneifer, H., & Muslimi, N. (2019). Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods: A new and practical approach. (In Persian). Negah danesh. https://db.ketab.ir/bookview.aspx?bookid=2418064
[33]   Shahraki Moghadam, S., Sadeh, E., & Aminisabegh, Z. (2021). Identifying relationships among components of logistic relief assessment in the humanitarian supply chain with fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Journal of natural environmental hazards, 10(28), 67-84. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2020.33697.1641