The estimation of process standard deviation in statistical quality control: A review and comparison of methods

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to compare and examine the statistical properties of four common estimators of process standard deviation for grouped data in statistical quality control.
Methodology: To achieve the research objectives, the bias and the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of the estimators will first be presented. Then, the estimators will be compared based on their MSEs.
Findings: It is shown that two estimators out of four estimators belong to two different classes of linear unbiased estimators with the minimum variance. Furthermore, numerical calculations show that the estimator based on the arithmetic mean of the group standard deviations is more efficient than the other estimators.
Originality/Value: Based on the results obtained in this study, it is suggested that for estimating the standard deviation of the process in grouped data, an estimator based on the arithmetic mean of the standard deviations of the groups should be used instead of estimators that are based on the arithmetic mean of the ranges of the groups.

Keywords

Subjects

[1]   Shewhart, W. A. (1924). Some applications of statistical methods to the analysis of physical and engineering data. Bell system technical journal3(1), 43-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1924.tb01347.x
[2]   Montgomery, D. C. (2020). Introduction to statistical quality control. John wiley & sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introduction+to+Statistical+Quality+Control%2C+8th+Edition-p-9781119399308
[3]   Álvarez, E., Moya-Férnandez, P. J., Blanco-Encomienda, F. J., & Muñoz, J. F. (2015). Methodological insights for industrial quality control management: The impact of various estimators of the standard deviation on the process capability index. Journal of king saud university-science27(3), 271-277.
[4]   Pearson, E. S. (1932). The percentage limits for the distribution of range in samples from a normal population (n 100.). Biometrika24(3/4), 404-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331974
[5]   Gupta, B. C. (2021). Statistical quality control: Using MINITAB, R, JMP and Python. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.amazon.com/Statistical-Quality-Control-Bhisham-Gupta/dp/1119671639
[6]   Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2024). Statistical inference. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://www.routledge.com/link/link/p/book/9781032593036
[7]   Luko, S. N. (1996). Concerning the estimators R/d2 And R/d2* in estimating variability in a normal universe. Quality engineering8(3), 481-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119608904651
[8]   Woodall, W. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (2000). Using ranges to estimate variability. Quality engineering13(2), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110108918643
[9]   Mahmoud, M. A., Henderson, G. R., Epprecht, E. K., & Woodall, W. H. (2010). Estimating the standard deviation in quality-control applications. Journal of quality technology42(4), 348-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2010.11917832